second part:
IN this SECOND Part after the intruduction, I want to go in " medias res" and just explain what this blog now mainly, focusses on and what i call The INVISIBLE ERUPTION"
SEP ( solar energetic particles) , the terms as used in the US
also called "SAP" ( solar acceleraded Protons) - the European term the one I prefer , as indeed only proton are emmited with these events
the event also is called Solar Particle event(SPE)
The following essay gives a short overview about what was coincident in all of the 50- 100 SEPs I observed and compared since 2012
(...draft...)
Before we anyway discuss and understand the processes on the Sun- the socalled " heliophysics" , we must define or at least try to understand the basic forces that sustain the activities on the sun, thos produce light and heat and those make life possible on Earth,
THE MAGNETISM
Magnetism accomponies us human beings since begin of our history at least in that form as experienced just by the fact that we are not swaying above the ground but are attrackted by the Earth below as well as all things fall back to the ground .
With the end of the 19 century and at begin of the 20th century, when Madame and Monsieur Curie began to explore what is called an atom, when electric currents were discovered and electric energy was produced , magnetism ( better: electromagnetism) nor only becam the essential driver of the industrial age anc technical evolution. Magmetisms was also new defined not just as any magical power of nature , but as a force that derives from interactivities in subnuclear particles- A new branch of science that later was called then " Quantum mechanics"
Meanhwile this science has brought along so "many flowers" resp theories up to the quark and string theories ,t since scientist still believe that any newly discovered subaoimic particle might consists itself again out of other even sdmaller particles. I don`t really deny that possibility but I am not really familar with, since no effect related to those particles can really be observed measured or felt as such , that would be different to the known effects of the real existing and approved primary particles the electrons and protons .
Simply eplained: there is just one force and property what we understand as mass or matter ( what we can touch and feel) ever had, what it forever will ever posses and what it never can lose: the gravity
"on the othger side" there is no other form of energy know in our present form of universe than what is called "acceleration of mass". The difference between these two fundamental forces , those together form space matter and in our experience time and energy , is that gravity is property all mass ever had posessed and never will lose, while
energy in form of acceleration only once in time had to be induced into that matter with the big bang and never again to create all what we know and see, as well as all forms of energy ( from th sun to any motor used on earth) we distinguish today
BIG BANG?
in the theory of the big bang, before time and space was created the mass of the entire universe existed in form of an ultimate dense rather round piece of matter somewhere in the umilited space. A dark ultimately dense and heavy piece of matter without any energy or movement. Then at any time, so the theory the "big bang" occured by any impact of energy into this primary matter What ever caused this primary and initial event is not known. Maybe god took his finger or if not then anything else brought this piece of matter into rotation.
Many scientist still believe what I simply would call or understand as unlogical nonsens: They believe that all mass would at last be comprimated energy and thus could be transformed into pure energy or finally would dissolve into something they call energy- something that- differently to what we know as matter for sure has NO SUBSTANCE , therfor not can be found as such nor that it could be filled into bottles or stored in any other form.
From the first theories on those still were factchecked and approvable : Energy is just matter that moves - in other physical terms :
Energy (E) = Mass ( matter) x (times) acceleration
---------
Fact checked and approvable is also, that mass or matter can change its degree of acceleration: we can slow down and accelerate things as we like. and we also know that things can come to and the entire universe even come to an absolute stillstand .
In other words: matter does not neccessarely need energy to exist, and matter even doesn`t tend or want to absorb energy ot to become accelerated . On other words: Matter does`nt need energy to exist but energy needs matter to come to existence.
THis real property of mass is what has fascinated my all my life and is called Inertia of mass". Here I must seriously critisize that all schoolbooks and online sources even this fundamenal definition is now contributed and related in any form only to Albert Einstein, and more an more not any other names or works of other scientist ar mentioned anymore, llthough GRavity and its porperty ies was already explored was defined such as By Isaac newton long before einstein even was born . Albert Einstein just redefinded Gravity due to his basic cosmological theories .
we might not have made that final experience yet, but its just ridiculous to see, how scientists and scholars or university professors such as Steven hawking drag along this unlogical idea that mass = energy . in other words mass would consist out of energy or be something like comprimated energy . They refer their theory to Einstein. Something. Einstein obvioulsy never believed : His equation says something different , so either those scientists or even Albert Einstein can`t have been familiar with basic mathematics .
To say Energy is the same like mass would be expressed by the following mathematic equation
E (Energy) -= M ( Mass) but Einstein wrote;
Energy is mass times the speed of light ( squared)
which is in real "just" the equation how light comes to existence due to the common physical theoories . But light as well as the electricity/ electromagnetism which a si always associated to any light wave ist just one , a tertiär form of energy
( acceleration is the first, partial gravity collapse the second)
Nevertheless , then calim and hypothesis, that mass is pure energy and quote the same as energy is in any brainwashing form still kept alive by physicist and scholars all around the world today and is contributed also to the theory of the the "big bang", as it is also believed the bg bang was what chemists call an "endothermal reaction "
THERE WAS NO BIG BANG BUT a "BIG SPIN" !!
"An explosion is a rapid increase in volume and release of energy in an extreme manner, usually with the generation of high temperatures and the release of gases. (wikipedia)!"
In case of a singular body as presumed to have existed priorly to that bing bang, such an explosion if triggered in its center ( by what?) would accelerate all matter around radially from the explotion center into all directions . The result however would have been ( as easily imaginable) that these particles would in all eternity spread apart from each other in all directions losing more and more their gravity on another and could so never combine again to matter stars galaxies or any larger body at all.
the other main or contraversial question among scientists and scholars regarding the begin of time and space might be whether an INTERNAL or an EXTERNAL force, resp SOURCE OF ENERGY has caused what they call the "big bang".
I myself however believe that only an external force can have caused this primary mass to expand in any form, but likely not with an explosion, but by bringing it into an rotation until at any time this rotation ( centrifugal powers) became fast enough that the particles began to spread apart from each other and formed the primary DISC - even all expanding objects in the universe, those derived secondarely from that primary expanding disc have until today .
In this model all matter emerging form the "big spin" would achieve the same initial speed at the same time , Thus ( easily expressed) they first begin to collide with one another and formed with a while tw0 different types of particles . By this collosions - one part of the particles split apart and formed fast but just tiny electrons, while others bigger remained intact and formed protons. Just because the energy cannot dissapear , so pairs of electrons and proton formed to hydrogen as the basic bricks for time and space, as the potential energyand also the antagonistoic gravity and mass of protons and electrons is so different both antagonists cannt combinen resp melt on in another
This law, that protons must be associated to electrons seems tome to be an universal law.
this gravity/ energy antagonism however is established and possibe in any thinkable seize in matter and different and on all imaginable energetic levels. In otzher words: (where is a proton there is an electron) if not, matter would either collapse or explode
This proto/ electron or gravity/ energy antagonism can be perfectly observed on processes on the SUN, expecially with tzhe socalled SEPs as mentioned in this blog and as being the main issue this blog meanhile focusses on to observe and explore.
FUTURE OF THE UNIVERSE:
all particles have some their initial cinetic energy until today: However One intitial acceleration was enoughto create the entire universe as we know it and sustains also all secondary energetic processes within until today
The main transformation of energy ocurred since, resp since the first( in the third phase after the big spin" giant) star were born .
However: All energetic processes in this universe are just opposite to the big spin ,that accelerated mass, while everything since then consumes reps tranforms that energy is based on the principle of what is called " Gravitaty collapse" this happens with fusion processes inn the sun as well as in a comparable event of nuclear fission . the tertiar form of energy would therefor be all chemical and biochemical procvesses we use in our daily life
There was something like a big acceleration at begin of time but it was not a " bang". a "Bang" however everybody would understand as an explosion.
So I believe: The only possibilty the universe came to existence in the from as we see it today can theore have been not a big bang but any EXTERNAL FORCE
and this fundamental definition that MASS IS NOT THE SAME AS ENERGY ( BUT MASS AND ENERGY ARE GENERALLY TWO ANTAGONISTS) is also essential to understand what is called " magnetism" as it - allthough invisible- really is
( will be continued soon...
THE EARTH S MAGNETIC FIELD
The earth magnetic field plays the key role in the impact , the course and the stronggeophysical effects SEPs have - differently to all other known solar eruption tpes such as solar flares prominences and regular CMEs ( coronal mass ejections) those have compared to SEPs jsut minor effects or none at all.
Why has the Earth magnetic field a Southern and Northern pole like a magnet?
The polarity within the geomagnetic field is not created by the existence of free electrons alone but -similar to a dynamo- by the Earth`s own rotation . So- usually, the "negative pole", where the electrons accumulate is in the South and the gravity pole in the North and it would not be a big thing or need much, if that polarity would really flip or shift regularly from South to North .This might be caused # so i could believe- just by a minor shifts of the gravity centrer on the Sun to the South or North , as the sun has -differently to the Earth not a fixed gravity center a rather dynamic gravitional center and field
Protons have numerous effects when entering the earth magnetic field an geosphere
Protons are rather not energetc or antienergetic particles. Antienergetic in the context to energy to stands here for gravity . The only known "potential" energy they posess as any other particle moving through the universe results from the acceleration all protons received by the big bang at the begin of time .
WHAT IS AN SEP ( also called SAP or SPE) ?
The solar event, the socalled SEP (solar energetic particles) SAP( Solar accelerated protons) or SPE ( solar proton event) is barely explored .
Out of at least 50 minor and major SEPs I observed during the past 2 years , I call SEP "the invisible eruption" that cannot be really observed but they seem to trigger an sometimes ( if the evnt takes place near to the solar surface) visible specific type of surface eruptions which looks very similar to a large hydrogen bombs that explodes underground Sometimes the explosion occurs deeper with the solar hull that no surface event can be seen and protons can just be measured by satellites such as ACE or GOES
. SEP are typically occur in ( an are therefor related to) active solar region with larger sun spots . As I believe by own observation, they are even by scientists rather confused with solar flares and CMEs , those happen mostly almost simultanously but are rather triggered by the SEP and not opposite. Some SEPs trigger high secondary activities hose can last for days such as shockwaves running over th surface and major flares and sometimes an entire cluster of multiple CMEs unleashed in their aftermath.
NO OFFICIAL THEORY about SEPs
As I believe SEPs are larger or elder sun spots , thos sink at any time deeper into the Suns gaz hull until they reach layers with so strong magnetic forces that they are torn apart into their single particles - obvioulsy only protons , sun psots most likely may consist of (what explains that they behave like black holes k, that no light can penetrate a sun spot as this mass of protons is so dense any heavy that it even cannot absorb any energy)
PROTON IMPACTS
what is known is, that these solar protons if they hit the geomagnetic field fully impact by their positive charge ( in real only gravity) . However- as subatomar particles they only can aasociate to their counterparts. the electrons and move therefor along the longitudenal geomagnetic field lines towards the usually negtiav charged Southern pole . This is known and can be find also in wikipedia)
How these protons actually behave then is not explored resp cannot be really explored entirely yet. Most likely, as it can be considered by observation of the effects, protons from low speed SEPs ( with velocities around 20.000- 80.000 km/s) move to the Southern pole along the geomagnetic field lines and axis through the earth on an polar orbit around the earth and through the Earth body., whiole they transform their coinetic energy into friction and heat.
HOW DO THESE PROTONS LIKELY BEHAVE WITHIN THE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD?
High speed protons first seem not to have any effects at all, , what raised my theory , that these high speed protons might first move on a wider polar orbit around the Earth even beyond the edge of the geomagnetic field, with a closest approach on the Southern and secondary the Northern Pole. Thus they cause first - and as again observed with this recent SEP only friction there , while it takes a certain time to slow down and get in friction with the Earth geomagnetic field, atmosphere and Earth boday. Most likely,after these protons have slown down to an subcritical speed by any by during this friction process , they "end up" within the earth body and core where they integrate in existing atoms or form Neutrons with the later atrrackted electrons if these as well reach a subcritical speed and discharge inot the Earth body. In Fact protons impacting with SEPs "only "cause heat effects. Their total energy however must be imagined in solar dimensions .
Sure is also that all protons impacting with solar SEPs with a while approach by their gravity (depending on their speed ) the earth , wehere they move along with the electrons on the geomagnetic field lines on polar/ longitudenal orbits those lead through the Earth axis an core or mantle.
As mentioned already above- if solar accelerated protons have such a high speed as the SEP from April 18 2014, these protons would first rather move on an orbit in a higher distance around the earth similar as a satellite , until they are slow enough to integrate into the geomagnetic field , to get in friction with , and to slow down significantly.This probably explains why the effects of extreme fast SEP protons take place lately with an delay of about 1 week and more.
SEP/ PHASE II. ELECTRON ACCUMULATION:
the second phase hat sets in when the initial proton storm eases, is that the Earth now neeeds an equivalent amount of electrons ( it that just attrackts energetic electrons from the solar magnetic field ) to restore the "particle neutrality " resp top form finally electron/ proton pairs resp Neutrons . This is a fundamental universal law , as protons and electron even cannot really sperate( nor be be seperated form another permanently .If there would not be that equivalence of protons and electrons throughout the universe, , all matter would be instable and either collapse or explode.
The Max Planck Institut in Munich/ Germany describes that procvess as a "short circuit "between the Earth geomagnetic field and the solar magnetic field, by which the earth axis temporarely would " heat up like a stove" (unfortunately iIhave not found this online article again so I could post it here.
While solar protons effect mainly on and through the Southern geopole, these electrons aatrackted after the proton event so far its is known . accmulate above the Northern geopole. Compared evenst whos that this electron accumulation after one SEP would last about 3- 4 weeks . after that time normally these highe energetic solar electrons would significantly slow down with a final collapse and discharge. During this period these electrons have many effects such as strong thunderstorms and tornadoes, they induce high currrents into power grids and- as recent ship tragedies indicate likely also ships on high sea. They also and that mainly on the Northern hemisphere lead to longer heat periods with possibly droughts
SEP phase III:
If the energy in these solar electrons is comsumed, resp has transformed into heat it comes to as kind of collapse , which is also the inmdicator when the affected tectonic plates are cooling down . This last phase is again accomponied by strong earthquakes ., those occure, as these tectonic plates when heated up by the protons impact, expand and become morer soft , while the contract again and harden when they again are cooling down . THIS THEN CAUSES FRICTION ON PLATE BOUNDARIES THOSE CAN RESULT IN CATASTROPHIC EARTHQUAKE EVENTS: